I'm not gonna say I or 'we' were right... The debate became a war where nobody was going to give up, and that's good; that allows us to have many different views and leads to fluency and well-spoken English... Anyway! I give my reasons of why I think it's an academic text:
First of all, and in a different way as the other group thought, I am sure it has a structure where we can see a thesis, an order in arguments with its historical and own-experience supports and a conclusion. Into this first reason is the second one, the arguments are well-presented and he doesn’t mention them just because… He starts from the title “WHY I WRITE” and talks about that punctually. Another one is the support he gives to his own history by mentioning the main aspects which put him in the role of writer and overall how these aspects led him to know how to write.
These are just some reasons without saying the ones of the other group were very valid... As a matter of fact I must say I was confused in some parts of the debate... But at the end I really thought it is an academic text.
First of all, and in a different way as the other group thought, I am sure it has a structure where we can see a thesis, an order in arguments with its historical and own-experience supports and a conclusion. Into this first reason is the second one, the arguments are well-presented and he doesn’t mention them just because… He starts from the title “WHY I WRITE” and talks about that punctually. Another one is the support he gives to his own history by mentioning the main aspects which put him in the role of writer and overall how these aspects led him to know how to write.
These are just some reasons without saying the ones of the other group were very valid... As a matter of fact I must say I was confused in some parts of the debate... But at the end I really thought it is an academic text.
No comments:
Post a Comment